Machine learning-enhanced nonlinear differential equation model for predicting osteoporosis progression using bone density imaging data


Abstract views: 5 / PDF downloads: 0

Authors

  • K. Sundareswari Professor in Mathematics, Al-Ameen Engineering College (Autonomous), Erode, Tamil Nadu
  • Yunusova Sayyora Toshkenboyevna Department of Information Processing and Management Systems, Tashkent State Technical University, Tashkent
  • Gulandom Shodikulova Head of the Department of Internal Diseases No. 3, Professor, Samarkand State Medical University, Samarkand, Uzbekistan
  • Natalya Yusupova Associate Professor, Doctor of Arts, Tashkent University of Information Technologies named after Muhammad al-Khwarizmi, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
  • Otabek Mirzayev Teacher, Department of Transport Systems, Urgench State University named after Abu Rayhan Biruni, Urgench, Republic of Uzbekistan
  • R. Jayanthi Associate Professor, Department of Master of Computer Applications, Dayananda Sagar College of Engineering, Bangalore 560078, Karnataka, India
  • Mahesh Sahebrao Wavare Professor and Head, Department of Mathematics, Rajarshi Shahu Mahavidyalaya, Latur

Keywords:

Osteoporosis, nonlinear dynamics, bone remodeling, machine learning, neural differential equations, DXA, QCT

Abstract

Osteoporosis refers to a chronic bone disease that is characterised by bone loss, microarchitectural loss and high likelihood of getting fragility fracture. Proper forecasting of disease in order to intervene early and plan therapy is crucial. The current research will develop a hybrid modelling system that combines machine learning with nonlinear differential equations to predict the development of osteoporosis through longitudinal bone density imaging. A model of nonlinear bone remodelling is derived based on the coupled system of osteoclast and osteoblast functions, the parameters of the resorption and formation process are adaptively determined with the help of machine learning. External inputs include imaging biomarkers of DXA, QCT and HR-pQCT scans which are used to calibrate
patient-specific remodelling behaviour. It is also extended to a neural differential equation module that is designed to improve the faithfulness of prediction by learning nonlinearities of higher-order that are not modelled by classical physiology-based equations. On of the longitudinal bone imaging dataset, experiments show that the hybrid model has a high prediction accuracy, which decreases
the mean absolute BMD error by 23% relative to standalone ML models and 31 relative to classical ODE models. Noise, missing modalities and variation in the follow-up interval The robustness testing demonstrates that there is negligible predictive power loss with robustness testing. These results imply the possibility of the machine-learning-enhanced nonlinear models yielding predictions on osteoporosis progression that could be used in practise.

References

Abıdın, Z. U., Naqvi, R. A., Haider, A., Kim, H. S., Jeong, D., & Lee, S. W. (2024). Recent deep learning-based brain tumor segmentation models using multi-modality magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective survey. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 12, 1392807. Frontiers Media. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1392807

Ahmadi, M., Biswas, D., Lin, M., Vrionis, F. D., Hashemi, J., & Tang, Y. (2025). Physics-informed machine learning for advancing computational medical imaging: integrating data-driven approaches with fundamental physical principles. Artificial Intelligence Review, 58(10). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-025-11303-w

Avazov, K., Mirzakhalilov, S., Umirzakova, S., Abdusalomov, A., & Cho, Y. I. (2024). Dynamic Focus on Tumor Boundaries: A Lightweight U-Net for MRI Brain Tumor Segmentation. Bioengineering, 11(12), 1302. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11121302

Booch, K., Wehrmeister, L. H., & Parizi, P. (2025). Ultra-low latency WSN systems. SCCTS Journal of Embedded Systems Design and Applications, 2(1), 36–42.

Cariola, A., Sibilano, E., Guerriero, A., Bevilacqua, V., & Brunetti, A. (2025). Deep learning strategies for semantic segmentation of pediatric brain tumors in multiparametric MRI. Scientific Reports, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-07257-2

Cepeda, S., Romero, R., Garcia-Perez, D., Blasco, G., Luppino, L. T., Kuttner, S., Arrese, I., Solheim, O., Eikenes, L., Karlberg, A., Perez-Nunez, A., Escudero, T., Hornero, R., & Sarabia, R. (2024). Postoperative glioblastoma segmentation: Development of a fully automated pipeline using deep convolutional neural networks and comparison with currently available models. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2404.11725

Dorfner, F. J., Patel, J., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Gerstner, E. R., & Bridge, C. P. (2025). A review of deep learning for brain tumor analysis in MRI [Review of A review of deep learning for brain tumor analysis in MRI]. Npj Precision Oncology, 9(1). Nature Portfolio. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-024-00789-2

Hashmi, S., Lugo, J., Elsayed, A., Saggurthi, D., Elseiagy, M., Nurkamal, A., Walia, J., Maani, F. A., & Yaqub,M. (2024). Optimizing Brain Tumor Segmentation with MedNeXt: BraTS 2024 SSA and Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2411.15872

Hassan, M., Fateh, A. A., Lin, J., Zhuang, Y., Lin, G., Xiong, H., Zhou, Y., Qin, P., & Zeng, H. (2024). Unfolding Explainable AI for Brain Tumor Segmentation. Neurocomputing, 599, 128058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2024.128058

Javier, F. et al. (2025). Wearable IoT sensors for healthcare monitoring. Journal of Wireless Sensor Networks and IoT, 2(1), 31–41.

Laslo, D., Georgiou, E., Linguraru, M. G., Rauschecker, A., Muller, S., Jutzeler, C. R., & Bruningk, S. (2025). Mechanistic Learning with Guided Diffusion Models to Predict Spatio-Temporal Brain Tumor Growth. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2509.09610

Lin, Y., Zhang, D., Xiao, F., Chen, Y., Cheng, K., & Chen, H. (2025). Rethinking boundary detection in deep learning-based medical image segmentation. Medical Image Analysis, 103, 103615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2025.103615

Muralidharan, J. (2024). Advancements in 5G technology. Progress in Electronics and Communication Engineering, 1(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.31838/PECE/01.01.01

Papalou, A. (2023). Health information system implementation. International Journal of Communication and Computer Technologies, 8(2), 1–4.

Saifullah, S., & Dreżewski, R. (2025). PSO-UNet: Particle Swarm-Optimized U-Net Framework for Precise Multimodal Brain Tumor Segmentation. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2503.19152

Saleh, M. A., & Biswal, B. B. (2025). From U-Net to Swin-Unet Transformers: The Next-Generation Advances in Brain Tumor Segmentation with Deep Learning. Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering, 18(8), 328. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbise.2025.188024

Tanveer, H., Faheem, M., Khan, A., & Adam, M. A. (2024). Deep learning for automated medical image segmentation in brain tumor detection. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 13(2), 4377. https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2024.13.2.2570

Velliangiri, A. (2025). Edge-aware signal processing in IoT SHM. National Journal of Signal and Image Processing, 1(1), 18–25.

Yang, T., Lu, X. L., Yang, L., Yang, M., Chen, J., & Zhao, H. (2025). Application of MRI image segmentation algorithm for brain tumors based on improved YOLO. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2024.1510175

Zeineldin, R. A., & Mathis-Ullrich, F. (2024). Unified HT-CNNs Architecture: Transfer Learning for Segmenting Diverse Brain Tumors in MRI from Gliomas to Pediatric Tumors. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2412.08240

Downloads

Published

2026-01-14

How to Cite

K. Sundareswari, Yunusova Sayyora Toshkenboyevna, Gulandom Shodikulova, Natalya Yusupova, Otabek Mirzayev, R. Jayanthi, & Mahesh Sahebrao Wavare. (2026). Machine learning-enhanced nonlinear differential equation model for predicting osteoporosis progression using bone density imaging data. Results in Nonlinear Analysis, 8(4), 12–23. Retrieved from https://www.nonlinear-analysis.com/index.php/pub/article/view/801